I was working on the trap speed shown, I thought the car trapped at 115.47 MPH.I had shown you a member's tuned CLA45s that trapped a little over 122mph and you said the car should have gained 55 flywheel hp. Now you're saying it should be trapping 120 to be 490. Which one is it?
And I also think you got it wrong; 116mph is stock trap, I dunno where 470 came from.
Your cheap shot was at @Turbo Ed mate, please don't distract the audience. Pretty disgraceful for a "Super Moderator" to a member who's contributed lots so far.Yes. It was a cheap shot, I agree.
Couldn’t resist nevertheless.
Let’s put more meat on this “Golf R isn’t as quick as previous versions” ….
Post #719 Carwow - 12.3s
Post #772 Carwow - 12.4s
Post #929 Carwow - 12.7s
Carwow vs SQ7 - 12.7s
All within the tolerances of different day, different car, different weather, different tyres, and err, different weight (regardless of it being a cheap shot)!
Give us all a break, your cheap shot post was nothing to do with Golf R, just a dig at @ Turbo Ed. Apologise or quit.Actually, it was both for TurboEd and Forrester, who claimed that the Golf R was nowhere as fast as previous versions.
None of us are perfect, moderators or not
You’re assuming a lot here, primarily my original intent, how much humour was meant, and to whom it was directed.Moderators should respect all members and with you being a "Super Moderator" that makes your posts unacceptable. As I said, apologise or quit. Arrogance in moderators is fatal.