Mercedes A-Class Forum banner

Don't wait for the brake pad wear warning

10K views 18 replies 6 participants last post by  Theo  
#1 ·
I wanted to talk about why you should regularly keep an eye on your pads yourself, instead of waiting for the warning to come on, especially when you're below 1/3 thickness. In fact, you should start considering booking an appointment from as early as that, and I'll tell you why. You may be aware that we only have one sensor, located into the right hand side caliper, don't know if it's the other one in the UK but anyway doesn't matter it's still one caliper, and actually it's placed so that it can detect wear on only one pad. I don't know why we don't have one sensor per pad, is it down to costs, more complex system I have no idea, but what that means is that you have another three pads wearing out at the same time and you have no way of knowing whether they are at the same wear level, better or worse. And make no mistake, they never wear at the exact same pace. Now, obviously that one sensor is supposed to be designed and placed in a way to account for minor wear difference between the pads, letting you know before the thinnest of them all starts scrapping on your disc. But, could minor be enough? With no further ado, let me show you what could happen if you religiously relied on the warning.

Here are my left hand side pads, outer-inner from left to right. Nothing too worrisome.



And here are my right hand side pads, again outer-inner. How do you like my inner?



You would think I at least got the warning, right? You would be wrong, still no warning.

But let me give you the backstory. So I was happily driving around town at 80kph until I started hearing a faint grinding noise when braking at low speeds, like in the last few meters before the stop light. Pulled over, checked pads, well, as you can see in the pics (remember I could only take a look at the outer pad), nothing seemed alarming although I knew they were due to be changed soon (reason why I had already purchased them and was just waiting for the warning). Both discs also had a circular marker-thick pad mark at about the center of the disc, which happens often when you stop aggressively a few times (which I did the day before that) and then when you brake normally, the pad gradually wipes it off. On my way home, I had the noise when stopping at every stop light and then, in the last 5-10 minutes I noticed it went away. Parked the car and went to check again. Mark was gone.

Next morning I called my brake mechanic who's also the owner of the business, whom I've known for a decade, he's the pure definition of professionalism, and after describing the issue he said, first of all I should never rely on the warning and what I was hearing could've been the pad grinding on itself, meaning it could've been grinding on what it had left on the disc (the marker line). Which isn't a bad thing, but a pad that is too worn, can often develop spots with harsh surface and that can pair with the marks on the disc and produce horrible noises. Although that may not necessarily damage the disc, over time it can cause white spots and slight circular grooves which you can feel if you run your finger over it. But either way, he said we'd better get them checked and probably replaced. I said oh great I happen to have the pads over here, along with a new sensor, and he said to give him a call in a couple of hours cause he may be able to squeeze me into his schedule, and he did. In fact he worked an extra two hours after closing hours, just for me.

Here's a couple more pics, to give you an idea of what a pad's surface can turn into when it goes way too thin.

This is the left-hand side (outer-inner). Slight discoloration on the inner.



But take a look at the right-hand side. Zoom in if you can't see it. Now this is not something you want on your disc.



Now I'm gonna show you what else was slightly grinding.

These are my discs after I got the pads replaced. Notice the circumference of the discs? See how the right-hand side looks cleaner while the left hand-side more brownish? Well this is rust, completely normal, but why's the right disc clean?



Because, if you go back to the right hand-side pads pic, especially the middle one, you'll see the pad's case or whatever you wanna call it, I don't even know what it's called, being a hair away from the pad's surface. Now you can imagine, a disc that is already at 50% thickness itself, has a circumference that sticks out further. And that pad's case was slightly "cleaning" the disc's circumference, hence why it's clean from rust, while the other one isn't.

Of course nothing to worry about, nothing bad happened to the disc, it will quickly develop the same rust as before, as for the grooves that you can feel with your finger (it's those very thin marks, like those found on vinyl records), they have already been cleared by the new pads after having done 200km since. I'll try to remember and take another pic for you tomorrow, so you can see they now look almost mirror-like.

Alright, so, listen, just don't wait for the warning, it's bad! At least as far as the A45s is concerned. There was another Mercedes, some C class I believe, just before getting the car on the ramps, that was also in for new pads, and my mechanic showed me what all his four pads looked like. Well, absolutely nothing as scary-close as ours, and he got his warning. AMG has literally not allowed nearly any pad margin in our cars, despite what dealerships will tell you (the usual 1500km after warning).

Take pad wear into your own hands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: veeeight
#2 ·
200km on the new pads and disc is almost cleared. Forgot to take a pic of the other one but it looks the same.

 
#5 ·
Thank you too, just thought I'd give people a heads up.

Oh, well done. So did I, but that's because of all the cars equipped with pad sensors that I've owned, I upgraded the brakes to either 4 or 6 piston kits long before my first pad replacement, so I never got to test the sensor's accuracy. And then the big brake upgrades never came with sensors. Turns out, my first ever test didn't work out for me very well and I'm fortunate it didn't cost me a pair of discs.

how can i know just from looking from the outside, the best i can do is get my phone flash and look at it through the wheel, what am i looking for
You're looking at the pad's thickness, basically if any of the two pads is around 5mm it would be a good idea to get them checked, probably earlier if you brake frequently. Be sure to have your new pads available, in case you need them, might have to place an order in advance. Your mechanic will take all four pads out, ask them to take a look yourself, and you will either get them replaced right away or they will give you a mileage estimate based on the worst possible braking habits.

I know you can't really measure a pad's thickness unless you take it out, so what I would suggest is, you see where the actual pad sits? The pads always come with a base so to speak, where they sit, see my pics. If the pad looks as thick as the base where it sits, get them checked. As you can see, my thickest of them all was thinner than its base. Knowing what I know now, I would've replaced 2k, possibly 4k miles earlier. I can't even imagine, with the thinnest pad in that condition, to have waited for the sensor a few more hundred miles, assuming the warning would have eventually come on (would it? lol), and then the dealership would've come and say I have an extra 1000 miles until replacement. Might have as well stuck my foot out and stopped as a true Flintstone.
 
#7 ·
Honestly, if you have the tools, it's a pretty straightforward process, but considering it's brakes we're talking about, not fitting a gauge where making a mistake wouldn't be life threatening, I would advise you to leave that to professionals.
 
#8 ·
we only have one sensor, located into the right hand side caliper, don't know if it's the other one in the UK but anyway doesn't matter it's still one caliper, and actually it's placed so that it can detect wear on only one pad. I don't know why we don't have one sensor per pad, is it down to costs, more complex system I have no idea, but what that means is that you have another three pads wearing out at the same time and you have no way of knowing whether they are at the same wear level
Very common to just have one sensor on low cost cars, keeps the costs down.

Looks like they didn’t improve the cheap monitoring system based on the A180d for the AMG A35 nor A45 :rolleyes:


In the USA market - they subsequently issued all owners with a gauge and supplementary booklet so that can check for themselves. I think the threat of litigation probably prompted this ;)



Image
 
#9 ·
Doesn't look like it can measure the inner pads though, the tool is only going to give you an accurate reading of what your eyes can see, so instead of guessing how much you have left, it will give you the actual thickness, which is nice, but having seen the massive difference between the outer and inner in my case, it doesn't seem much help. The only way to check the inner is by using a small mirror attached to a long stick, of course it's only going to give you a rough idea of how much you have left, you can't measure it. But let's be honest, you don't really have to measure it, nobody does, brake professionals don't. Just takes a little experience to know if it's good enough or need to book an appointment.

And that being said, from own experience, I would advise people to get it checked by a professional the moment you notice that the remaining pad is thinner, if not the same with the base on which it sits. This way, even if the inner pad is down to a 1/4 of that, it will still be safe to drive until your appointment, which is hardly what I could say for that paper-thin pad up there 👆. However, now I can brag about having consumed 100% of the product I paid for.
 
#11 ·
Yeah I changed the rears not long after I did the fronts, much to my surprise. My brake guy said it's down to the electronics (he knows how I drive). Then this last summer I did the fronts again, together with new rotors. I have since changed my driving style though, and have reduced its mileage considerably since we did the BT on the Cupra. So I estimate it won't be before late next year that I'll do the rears again, along with the rotors.
 
#12 ·
I don't want to tempt fate but at the service around seven months ago I was told my pads were only 50% worn. I was probably on around 22K miles then. Your pad use seems very high, and I hear what you say about your style of driving.
 
#17 ·
I too use engine braking sometimes but only on long downhill stretches. The only reason I wear or should I say used to wear my pads early is frequent 200-0's. Hence why both my front and rear rotors but mostly the fronts, had a prominent vinyl record look, it's a sign of aggressive usage. Perfectly normal. These are some high quality rotors btw, MB didn't cheap out on that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forrester
#18 ·
Matter of fact, calipers too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forrester
#19 ·
My only complaint really, is that they are non-directional, so we only get one p/n for both sides. This not only doesn't maximize heat dissipation or help with moving dust and debris away from the center, but opposite patterns don't look good. I come from having BBK'ed nearly all my former cars and as with all aftermarket BBK kits to the best of my knowledge, they were directional, so for me to find out that the A45s's were not (an €80k car without options and €115k fully loaded), you can guess I was pretty boggled. Nearly everything else was beyond my expectations though, so I learned to ignore this little detail.

Just curious why, I mean be that as it may, they certainly are some really good brakes and don't take my word for it, my own highly experienced mechanic and certified Brembo Italy garage owner confirms. I could complain about the fact that they aren't two-piece either, which would've made them lighter too, but MB would've had to go the extra mile for it as price difference between one-piece and two-piece can be quite significant (of course I would've opted for it if it was optional, like Audi did with the RS3 brakes). Non-directional though? Why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forrester